As always, do your own digging and think and discern facts for yourselves.
Scroll down for updates.
Conference Address by Gerald Rose, Schiller Institute Conference, September, 1993
Note the website linked below now requests that you disable your ad-blocker!
The Committee of 300: A Brief History of World Power…Venetian Black Nobility, Roots of Today’s Ruling Oligarchy by Dr John Coleman pdf
(Includes essays by Dr Webster Griffin Tarpley, also Eustace Mullins, Daniel Estulin)
Here’s an alternative for the Full text of “The Story of The Committee of 300” by Dr John Coleman.
From the same author writing for “One World of Nations”:
William Stuart 9 11 to Armageddon Bankers Plan Wars Interview – Youtube
And last but by no means least, for now (29 Jul 2016)
Business, Finance, WW1 and Russian Revolution by Ken Craggs added 1/6/2017
Updated 20/5/2017 to include this (see also First Word War Hidden History links above to see the shenanigans of WW1)
Thanks to Pennyforyourthoughts2.blogspot.ca
Updated 31/7/2016 to include this:
Great Britain is currently the only Western Democracy where unelected Archbishops and Bishops of the Church of England are eligible to sit in the House of Lords (Upper Chamber). (The only other country to have clerics in their Parliament is Iran.) The current list of Lords Spiritual can be found here.
The Archbishop of Canterbury is appointed by the Prime Minister
Updated 30/8/2016 to include: (90+ pages in this pdf)
Updated 18/9/2016 to include:
Lord Howe announced last November that the Ministry of Defence were training jihadist terrorists in Turkey. In 2010 Lord James confessed in the House of Lords to keeping Irish terrorist accounts at the Bank of England to the tune of over a billion pounds. So it turns out that for decades the British government were secretly paying the IRA to blow up and murder British soldiers and taxpayers [sic] . Lord James also had another billion of British taxpayers’ money – not for the NHS but for North African head choppers who wrecked Libya on behalf of unindicted war criminal David Cameron. A former British soldier is managing ‘civil defence’ for Al-Nusra in Syria. His head choppers are supported to the tune of millions by the British and American governments and of course would-be World President George Soros. They have just been nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize! Meanwhile, after Cameron’s breastbeating at the Commons Syria Debate on Dec 6th, the RAF plays cards at Akrotiri and does nothing, because the lying Tories in fact support Syria’s terrorists as they supported the IRA not so long ago. – Gordon Logan Tapnewswire.com
Check out “The Worshipful Company of International Bankers” !
Updated 27/1/17 to add
Updated 3/4/2017 to add:
“The World is in Good Hands” from NourishingObscurity.com
GLOBALISTS CREATED WAHHABI TERRORISM TO DESTROY ISLAM AND JUSTIFY A GLOBAL STATE by David Livingstone link
Updated 29 & 30/5/2017
“Corbyn and the Rothschilds” by Ken Craggs at Orphans of Liberty
This is longish, so please bear with me for a while….
Check these out first:
Matthew Chapter 6 verses 9 – 13 KJV Standard version
9 After this manner therefore pray ye: Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven.
11 Give us this day our daily bread.
12 And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
13 And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
From the earlier 1611 version of the King James Bible:
9 After this maner therefore pray yee: Our father which art in heauen, hallowed be thy name.
10 Thy kingdome come. Thy will be done, in earth, as it is in heauen.
11 Giue vs this day our daily bread.
12 And forgiue vs our debts, as we forgiue our debters.
13 And lead vs not into temptation, but deliuer vs from euill: For thine is the kingdome, and the power, and the glory, for euer, Amen.
view original: http://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-Chapter-6_Original-1611-KJV/
Luke Chapter 11 verses 2 – 9 KJV Standard version
And he said unto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come. Thy will be done, as in heaven, so in earth.
3 Give us day by day our daily bread.
4 And forgive us our sins; for we also forgive every one that is indebted to us. And lead us not into temptation; but deliver us from evil.
From the earlier 1611 version of the King James Bible:
2 And hee said vnto them, When ye pray, say, Our Father which art in heauen, Halowed be thy Name, Thy kingdome come, Thy will be done as in heauen, so in earth.
3 Giue vs day by day our dayly bread.
4 And forgiue vs our sinnes: for we also forgiue euery one that is indebted to vs. And lead vs not into temptation, but deliuer vs from euill.
And here’s the Book of Common Prayer version
Our Father, who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy Name,
thy kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread.
And forgive us our tresspasses,
as we forgive those
who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil.
For thine is the kingdom,
and the power, and the glory,
for ever and ever. Amen.
Notice the subtle changes, updated language and an extra ‘ever”. Nothing too spectacular. Several versions in existence and maybe more than the ones quoted above.
We learnt a version at infant school by rote, just like we learnt our multiplication tables. We never had a physical “hard” copy to look at and neither did the teacher, she just recited it from memory so if she’d remembered it wrong then we learnt her mistakes too. We learnt her version.
It wasn’t until I was given a KJV Bible as a gift when I was nine years old that I had the chance to read the “Lord’s Prayer” for myself and discovered the two different versions in Matthew and Luke which in turn were different to the one I’d been taught which was:
“Our Father who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive them that trespass against us and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil. Amen.”
That, I learnt years later is a version of the version found in the Roman Catholic Catechism.
At the age of 4 and a half I doubt any of us had a clue about trespassing or what temptation was though I do recall seeing a notice in a field whilst on a family day out which read “Trespassers will be Prosecuted”. I didn’t know what “prosecuted” was either but it was another big word and sounded very scary so I resolved to avoid “trespassing” at all costs till I was at least 11 and in the company of others. Sorry, I digress!
I pointed out these discrepancies to the adults around me at the time. The reasons attempted varied from “different churches have different versions of the Bible” to “the Bible was written in Old English and we don’t talk like that any more”. The latter reason seemed reasonable. Different churches having different versions left me wondering why but I’ll leave that for another day.
When I changed school at 11 there was another version to be learned. “Them” had changed to “those” (more grammatically correct) and “For thine is the kingdom, the power and the glory for ever and ever” was added. No-one explained why though I did ask. I got the stock answer when parents are fed up of kids asking too many questions “Because it just is!”
OK, so what’s the point of all this?
A couple of days ago I came across a comment on a website from someone claiming that his/her “timeline” had been changed because the Lord’s Prayer was not as he had remembered it and this was not the world he grew up in. Eh? He or she was using this as back up to that “effect” that’s been orbiting the interweb for the past few weeks. You know, the one named after a late SA president 😉 I re-read the comment several times and admit I laughed out loud then shook my head in disbelief that someone could not see the flaws in their thinking.
Yes, someone has at some time changed some of the words from what was originally translated into the KJV to the version which most are familiar with now. It wasn’t done by magic yesterday. Many assume that all religious quotes in common usage must come verbatim from the Bible but they don’t! Unfortunately few of us read the Bible before we were indoctrinated by religious teachers and other religious texts.
To try to prove their point they quote Luke 17 v 34
34 I tell you, in that night there shall be two men in one bed; the one shall be taken, and the other shall be left.
because (presumably in his other timeline) they always believed it was originally two men in a field. Uh-huh..
I wonder whether they bothered to check that passage out? Probably not because if they had and had read the next two verses they’d have seen this:
35 Two women shall be grinding together; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
36 Two men shall be in the field; the one shall be taken, and the other left.
What they’d originally believed was true and now they’ve discovered there were other examples of the same situation which presumably they’d never read or heard of before. Different “timeline” or rather more recently acquired knowledge?
Here’s another interesting verse quoted by the same commenter to try to prove his point presumably: Luke 19 v 27 (Jesus is speaking in parables and I suggest reading the verse in context starting at v 12 ) “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.” Jesus is relating what the nobleman in the parable said. Jesus also said in Matthew 5 v 44 “But I say unto you, Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you;”
The commenter was again trying to prove their “timeline” had flipped because Jesus preached “Love” and the Luke 19 passage seems to suggest the opposite when taken out of context. On the contrary, it shows their ignorance and misunderstanding of what is actually written in the Bible. Both passages are contained in the New Testament whether they’ve read them before or not. From the evidence it looks like this is news to the commentor being discussed here.
That said, there are plenty of contradictions in the Bible but that’s not what we’re talking about here.
I’ve seen it alleged that familiar words have been digitally changed on the web which may be true. However claiming that words have been changed “in the hard copy” can be checked by going to the original translations. There are over 50 versions of the Bible in English so how do you know like is being compared with like? Is admitting to a faulty memory better or worse than admitting you’ve fallen for a false meme?
A popular misquote such as “the lion will lie down with the lamb..” does not mean a timeline change. It means someone misquoted in your hearing! If you’d had to learn texts at Sunday School (guilty!) then you’d have read what it actually states in Isaiah 11 v 6 “The wolf and the lamb shall feed together..” Could be the confusion arose because there’s another text in Isaiah 65 v 25 where lion is mentioned in the same verse as lamb: “The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock:” Hmm! Who knew learning all those tedious texts would come in useful at this late stage?
Somehow the unseen “they” had managed to change the posters reality when in actual fact its more likely they’d had a knee-jerk reaction to some video currently doing the rounds.
“Knee-jerk” – definition a quick reaction that does not allow you time to consider something carefully.
Books get re-written and altered at intervals. For instance Enid Blyton’s Noddy books were changed because they are not PC. The titles of some of Agatha Christie’s books were also changed for the same reason.
I’ve just been back to see if anyone has pointed out the flaws in their comments only to find a small flock are now sucking them up. And people wonder why the world is the way it is. What happened to common sense? Don’t people think for themselves anymore? The Band-Wagon must be getting awfully crowded by now!
Only the gullible fall for the false memes so they become the target audience by default. Everyone is on a different learning curve, I suppose, so its all cool. 🙂
The “Snow White” boat won’t float either! Some are saying the words spoken by Snow White’s step-mother have changed from “Mirror, mirror on the wall” to “Magic Mirror on the wall” in another (weak) attempt to convince others of the “timeline change” malarkey. In the original story by the Grimm brothers it is “Looking-glass, looking-glass ” which has been changed to more modern parlance “Mirror, mirror“. Then the film-makers got hold of it and in order to convey to their audience that the mirror was not a run-of-the-mill piece of equipment the dialogue was changed to “Magic Mirror on the wall”….
Any other films that do not appear to be as you first remembered them, think about this:-
Films get re-edited and re-released from time to time, just as books do!
And here’s a snippet about the Bearenstain Bears 😉
See also Cognitive Dissonance
Updated 31 /12/2016 to add
When Positive Thinking Becomes Religion: How “The Secret” and “Law of Attraction” Poison Spirituality
The “New Thought” movement (the precursor of “The Secret”).
Meanwhile in the UK from MOH Forum added 6/10/15
Maybe not as “random” as they seem?
Or How to Acept Slavery and be Happy About It http://loveforlife.com.au/content/14/11/09/most-powerful-video-spirituality-happiness-slaves-or-how-accept-slavery-be-happy-ab
“We were asked by Dana….
“Arthur, have you ever seen this Eckhart Tolle video before? Although he does (only very briefly) mention a few constructs of the system, such as Jesus and Buddha, i think a lot of what he shares could really be helpful for people trying to break free of the illusion, and – even more so – the trauma. ”
You won’t see him point out all the nefarious psyops programs that locks the duped into “The System”. He maybe innocent of his duplicity but his work prepares the duped to enter the NWO without realising the psyops programs currently compelling them to continue their/our/MANS enslavement. The Dalai Lama is another blatant mis-leader using almost the same type of psyops programming tactics Echart Tolle is working with.
Everything gets incredibly simple, uncomplicated and easy when fallen-MAN can recognise the clearly defined distinction between SENSE & NON-SENSE, between sensory images and non-sensory images.
“The System” is trauma based and everything of “The System” is reaction to trauma which is all about giving our life-force-energy to non-sensory-images (darkness) to set them into motion.”
continued at the link above.