>>XMAS IN DC Who is arranging the PRIVATE meetings?
MZ campaign contribution promises.
FB donations since 4.2.18?
R’s targeted (censorship/anti R = more $).
How to mask?
MZ personal donations?
Recent stock dump?
Avoid FB public disclosure?
Track congressional intake (reported).
Keep open (+6 mo).
Loud w/ findings.
RT – how DC/swamp works.
Drain the swamp.
How do politicians access campaign contributions for personal use?
PEOPLE have POWER.
Don’t forget how to PLAY.
TOGETHER YOU ARE STRONG.
FB violation of YOUR PRIVACY.
FB actively TRACKING YOU.
FB reading your PRIVATE messages.
FB CENSORING (anti conservative).
More will drop.
We have it ALL.
CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS are EFFECTIVE.
What is Jack’s SECRET T-handle?
‘Dummy’ accounts to talk.
What you SEE is LIMITED.
Think emails (LL, HRC, HUSSEIN, etc).
MZ = Mark Zuckerberg
FB = FaceBook
R’s = Republicans
DC = Washington DC
We don’t intend decoding all the above, we aren’t codebreakers and all we and others can do is speculate until things come out in the news at some future date. “Future proves past”. There are plenty of YT channels and other blogs devoted to in-depth “Q” analysis to chose from.
This is what we are focussing on:
FB actively TRACKING YOU
Do you think because you don’t have a FB account that you are not being tracked? That’s what an Anon on 8chan thought when they replied to “Q”! They probably aren’t alone in thinking that no account equals no tracking.
“Facebook co-founder Mark Zuckerberg defends the social platform as a “positive force in the world” as he addresses Congress on Tuesday while admitting he made “a big mistake” by not taking seriously the social network’s responsibility to its two billion users”
Note that MZ was not under oath.
So all we need now is the “drop”. Hmmmm… What could that be?
Post 1130 from an Anon with reply from “Q” attached
As usual, this is just my opinion, based on my personal reading of the facts given to us.
As my best readers will remember, I suggested in a recent paper that the famous witch trials of history may have been faked as cover for Intelligence projects. In this paper, I will show evidence that suggestion is true, at least regarding the Salem event.
In that paper on the Occult, witchcraft in the 17th century in Europe came up as a tangential topic, and through that I was led to remind myself that it was also a topic in this past century (the 20th). I remembered that Arthur Miller debuted his play The Crucible in 1953. This reminded me that the Witchcraft Act in England was repealed in 1951 and that Gerald Gardner started Wicca in 1954. Those close dates seemed more than a coincidence, so I suggested maybe they weren’t. If The Crucible came out at that time as support for current projects, then it was possible that the Salem Witch trials were also a project. I didn’t have time to pursue it in that paper, so I am going to pursue it here.
Before my readers go ballistic, let me lead by saying that much of what Mullins said was true. That is the curious thing about an Anti. You really have to understand what an Anti is to understand my thesis here.
I first used the term Anti when outing Ezra Pound, which is apropos since Pound was Mullins’ mentor. In that paper, I described an Anti as someone who blackwashes the truth. They tell you the truth and then make it unpalatable to you, making sure you won’t or can’t accept it.
Comment from Think-and-Discern: The area known as King’s Cross has a reputation for drugs, prostitution, traficking and all related crimes from way, way back, though the place is in the process of being given a make-over and sanitised. Old associations still remain in the memory despite this. The sick irony in the fledgling wizards and “Platform 9¾” may not be visible to those who are unaware that many teenagers from the north and east of Britain head to London by train believing they will find the fulfilment of their dreams or promises there only to disappear shortly after they arrive at King’s Cross Station.
We start by realizing that Ian Fleming was an agent himself, so we have always been given clues via these books and films. We must assume the newer scriptwriters are also involved in Intelligence, either being agents themselves or being in constant consultation. The original and primary point of the novels and movies was as PR for Intelligence, but as the years have passed more and more clues are inserted into the films as well. I assume this is mostly as an inside joke: they know by now that almost no one is getting the clues, so they feel they don’t have to be careful. But they also may be signaling one another and those on the outside (assuming anyone but me is still outside Intelligence).